Editorial policy

Zeniteq is an AI publication founded by Jim Clyde Monge. We cover generative AI news, research, tools, and practical workflows for readers who want to understand what is changing and decide what is useful in their own work. These standards guide how we select, prepare, and maintain our coverage.

Our writers and editorial responsibility

Our articles carry a byline so readers can identify the writer and explore their other work. Jim Clyde Monge leads Zeniteq alongside contributing writers. Authors are responsible for representing their sources accurately, explaining the limits of their evidence, and distinguishing their own analysis from a product maker’s claims.

• Angelica Kim

  Technical writer

• James Rivera

  James Rivera is a technical writer at Zeniteq covering AI news, reviews, and step-by-step guides. His pieces aim to cut through marketing language and give readers grounded, usable information.

• Jim Clyde Monge

  Technical Writer

Visit our writer directory for current contributors, biographies, and published articles. A byline identifies authorship; a separate review label records an explicit editorial check in our publishing system.

Our wider publishing work

Our work also reaches readers through Generative AI Publication on Medium and our newsletter on Substack. These platforms give readers more ways to follow our coverage, explore the archive, and participate in the AI community:

• Generative AI on Medium — generativeai.pub: news, technical articles, and perspectives from contributors covering generative AI.
• Generative AI Publication — generativeaipub.com: our newsletter and publication archive, with updates delivered to subscribers.

Readers can use these archives and individual writer profiles to assess our published work. Each article should earn trust through its evidence, attribution, and clarity; publication on a particular platform does not replace those standards.

What we aim to publish

We prioritize developments and explanations that help readers make informed decisions: what a new model can do, where a tool may be useful, how a workflow works, and what limitations or trade-offs deserve attention. News reporting, tutorials, reviews, and opinion serve different purposes. Coverage should make its basis clear rather than presenting an announcement as independent testing.

Sources and evidence

We aim to link factual claims to primary sources, including research papers, official documentation, and product announcements. A Sources list at the end of each article collects its external citations. Inclusion in that list is not an endorsement or a guarantee that a source is independent. Vendor claims should be attributed to the vendor.

AI assistance and editorial review

Our publishing tools can use AI to assist with research, drafts, summaries, and images. AI output can be wrong. Editors are responsible for checking claims, links, quotations, and attribution before publishing. A review label appears only when an editor explicitly records that review; its absence means no review has been recorded in our publishing system.

Articles should add useful explanation, context, or analysis. We do not use a word-count quota or a search ranking target as a substitute for reader value. We do not present generated experiences, tests, or quotations as real.

Reviews and methodology

When an article reports hands-on testing, it should explain what was tested and the relevant conditions and limitations. Analysis based only on documentation or announcements should say so. A methodology note may appear at the end of an article.

Sponsored content

Paid articles are labelled Sponsored. Their external article links are marked as sponsored for search engines. Payment does not establish the accuracy of a claim, and sponsored articles should follow the same sourcing and disclosure standards.

Publication dates and updates

Publication dates identify when an article was published. An Updated date reflects an editorial change, not a new view or like. Significant factual corrections should be recorded in the article’s correction notes.

Report a correction

If you find an error, email jimclydegm@gmail.com with the article URL, the claim in question, and supporting evidence. We can then assess the evidence and determine whether a correction or clarification is needed. Significant factual corrections should explain what changed in the article’s correction notes. Minor wording or formatting edits do not imply new reporting.

Removed articles

An article that is permanently removed without a replacement returns a not-found response. We do not redirect unrelated deleted content to the homepage. If an article moves to a new URL, its old URL can redirect to the same article.